Job13
Sign inCheck a case

OSHA interpretation · 1992-06-12

Quality of hearing conservation programs & the Standard Threshold Shifts (STS) recording requirement.

← All interpretations§ 1904

OSHA’s standing caveat

Interpretation letters explain existing requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. Enforcement guidance may be affected by later changes to OSHA rules, and a letter addresses the facts it was given — not necessarily yours.

June 12, 1992 Mr. George R. Cook Health & Hygiene, Inc. 420 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro, North Carolina 27409 Dear Mr. Cook: I am responding to your letter of May 28 which was transferred to my office from the Directorate of Compliance. My Division of Recordkeeping Requirements is responsible for administering the OSHA injury and illness recordkeeping system nationwide. After reviewing your letter and discussing your phone conversations with Jim Maddux, I believe I understand your concerns as they relate to the relationship between the potential requirement to record Standard Threshold Shifts (STS) on the OSHA 200 Log and the quality of hearing conservation programs provided by employers. In summarizing those concerns, you have observed that many employers do not utilize the optional provisions of the occupational noise exposure standard (29 CFR 1910.95) including the correction of audiograms for presbycusis and the revision of baselines. As a result, many of these employers perform follow- up procedures (refitting of hearing protection devices, retraining of workers, etc.) more frequently than the minimum amount required by the standard. You further state your belief that if employers are required to record STS instances on the log they will attempt to minimize the number of recorded cases by fully utilizing the presbycusis and baseline revision options. Thus, you feel that this could result in less effective hearing conservation programs. At the present time, Federal OSHA enforcement policy requires the recording of 25 dB STS cases on the injury and illness records. As you know, we are drafting a proposal to revise the entire injury and illness recordkeeping system. As soon as possible, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking will be published in the Federal Register soliciting comments from interested parties. I encourage you to provide formal comments at that time. Thank you for your comments and insight concerning the recordkeeping requirements. If you have further questions or comments please contact my staff at (202) 523-1463. Sincerely, Stephen A. Newell Acting Director Office of Statistics

Reproduced verbatim from osha.gov. US Government work, public domain (17 U.S.C. § 105).

Other letters on the same sections

Deciding a case of your own?

The free recordability check works through Part 1904 in the order the regulation sets out and quotes the provision behind every step.

Check a case — free

Not legal advice. This page republishes 29 CFR Part 1904 as published by the eCFR and explains it. The recordkeeping duty is the employer’s. Where the rule requires judgement, Job13 says so rather than guessing — run your own case through the free check.