Job13

OSHA interpretation · 1993-10-26

Proper recording procedure for illnesses contracted outside of the United States.

OSHA’s standing caveat

Interpretation letters explain existing requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. Enforcement guidance may be affected by later changes to OSHA rules, and a letter addresses the facts it was given — not necessarily yours.

October 26, 1993 Ms. Lyn E. Lang Safety Systems Administrator Aluminum Company of America ALCOA Building Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 Dear Ms. Lang: Thank you for your letter dated September 23, requesting an interpretation for the proper recording procedure for illnesses contracted outside of the United States. Q&A A-12 on page 4 of the Recordkeeping Guidelines for Occupational Injuries and Illnesses best addresses this situation. Records need not be kept for employees when they are outside the geographic scope of coverage prescribed by Section 4(a) of the Act. Neither case described in your letter would be recordable, as long as the illness exposure occurred outside of the United States and it's territories. More specifically, the second scenario may be treated in the same fashion as symptoms that merely surface on the employers premises, but are the result of a non-work related event or exposure off premises (see Q&A C-8 on page 34 of the Guidelines). I hope you find this information useful. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact us at Area Code (202) 219-6463. Sincerely, Bob Whitmore Chief Division of Recordkeeping Requirements

Reproduced verbatim from osha.gov. US Government work, public domain (17 U.S.C. § 105).

Other letters on the same sections

Deciding a case of your own?

The free recordability check works through Part 1904 in the order the regulation sets out and quotes the provision behind every step.

Check a case — free

Not legal advice. This page republishes 29 CFR Part 1904 as published by the eCFR and explains it. The recordkeeping duty is the employer’s. Where the rule requires judgement, Job13 says so rather than guessing — run your own case through the free check.