Job13
Sign inCheck a case

OSHA interpretation · 1994-03-24

Clarification of occupational illness for OSHA 200 log.

← All interpretations§ 1904

OSHA’s standing caveat

Interpretation letters explain existing requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. Enforcement guidance may be affected by later changes to OSHA rules, and a letter addresses the facts it was given — not necessarily yours.

March 24, 1994 Mr. Michael D. Zoll, CSP Manager of Safety Alcan Aluminum Corporation 100 Erieview Post Office Box 6977 Cleveland, Ohio 44101-1977 Dear Mr. Zoll: Thank you for your letter dated February 8, requesting guidance on the proper recording of illnesses on the OSHA 200 Log. Your letter was forwarded to my office from the Directorate of Compliance Programs. The Division of Recordkeeping Requirements is responsible for the administration of the injury and illness recordkeeping system nationwide. For recordkeeping purposes, an occupational illness is any abnormal condition or disorder resulting from a non-instantaneous event or exposure within the work environment. Any such job related abnormality reported to the employer is recordable, whether or not functional impairment is present or lost workdays are involved (see Q&As E-8 and E-9 on page 41 of the Recordkeeping Guidelines for Occupational Injuries and Illnesses ). An illness is considered work related if an exposure at work either caused or contributed to the onset of symptoms or aggravated existing symptoms to the point that they meet OSHA recordability criteria. Moreover, if it seems likely that an event or exposure within the work environment either contributed to or aggravated the condition, it is considered work related (see Q&A B-17, page 32 of the Recordkeeping Guidelines). Therefore, unless the illness was caused solely by a non-work related event or exposure off premises, the case is presumed to be work related. If the physician is able to say that an employee's lung scarring was in no way contributed to or aggravated by the dust exposure (or any other exposure) within the work environment, then the case would not be considered work related, and therefore not recordable. If the condition is determined to be recordable, the case(s) should be recorded as Dust Diseases of the Lungs, column 7(b) on the Log. When recording occupational illnesses, enter the date of initial diagnosis or recognition of the illness, or, if absence from work occurred before diagnosis, enter the first day of absence attributable to the illness which was later diagnosed or detected (see page 9 of the Recordkeeping Guidelines). If a work related illness is discovered within 5 years after the employee retires, the case should be recorded in the year of occurrence if the date of the onset of illness can be identified. If not, the case should be recorded in the retiree's last year of employment (see Q&A E-5, on page 23 of the Recordkeeping Guidelines). I hope you find this information useful. If you have any further questions, please call us at Area Code (202) 219-6463. Sincerely, Bob Whitmore Chief Division of Recordkeeping Requirements

Reproduced verbatim from osha.gov. US Government work, public domain (17 U.S.C. § 105).

Other letters on the same sections

Deciding a case of your own?

The free recordability check works through Part 1904 in the order the regulation sets out and quotes the provision behind every step.

Check a case — free

Not legal advice. This page republishes 29 CFR Part 1904 as published by the eCFR and explains it. The recordkeeping duty is the employer’s. Where the rule requires judgement, Job13 says so rather than guessing — run your own case through the free check.