OSHA interpretation · 1995-07-07

Recording cases involving eye injuries on the OSHA Log.

← All interpretations § 1904

OSHA’s standing caveat

Interpretation letters explain existing requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. Enforcement guidance may be affected by later changes to OSHA rules, and a letter addresses the facts it was given — not necessarily yours.

July 7, 1995 Ms. Linda Ballas Linda Ballas & Associates 4413 Copper Creek Lane Toledo, Ohio 43615 Dear Linda: Thank you for your letter dated July 26 requesting an interpretation for recording cases involving eye injuries on the OSHA Log 200. Historically, we have not differentiated between types of corneal abrasions in regards to being classified as minor or non-minor. Therefore, an injury involving a corneal abrasion should not be recorded if it does not involve medical treatment, loss of consciousness, days away from work, days of restricted work activity or job transfer. I hope you find this information useful. If you have any further questions, please contact us at Area Code (202) 219-6463. Sincerely, Bob Whitmore Chief Division of Recordkeeping Requirements

Reproduced verbatim from osha.gov. US Government work, public domain (17 U.S.C. § 105).

Other letters on the same sections

Deciding a case of your own?

The free recordability check works through Part 1904 in the order the regulation sets out and quotes the provision behind every step.

Check a case — free

Not legal advice. This page republishes 29 CFR Part 1904 as published by the eCFR and explains it. The recordkeeping duty is the employer’s. Where the rule requires judgement, Job13 says so rather than guessing — run your own case through the free check.