Job13
Sign inCheck a case

OSHA interpretation · 1997-06-16

Removal of foreign bodies embedded in the eye is recordable.

← All interpretations§ 1904

OSHA’s standing caveat

Interpretation letters explain existing requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. Enforcement guidance may be affected by later changes to OSHA rules, and a letter addresses the facts it was given — not necessarily yours.

June 16, 1997 William M. Bernhart, CIH 4008 Alden Drive Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220 Dear Mr. Bernhart: Thank you for your letter dated June 2, 1997 asking if rust ring treatment of an eye injury is an OSHA recordable case. As indicated on page 43 of the Recordkeeping Guidelines for Occupational Injuries and Illnesses, any form of removal of foreign bodies embedded in the eye is considered medical treatment for recordkeeping purposes. This would include any technique to remove rust ring from the cornea. If the foreign body is not embedded , removal by means of irrigation or the use of a cotton swab are considered first aid. Any other means of removal (e.g. spud, etc.) must be considered medical treatment. I hope you find this information helpful. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact my staff at Area Code (202) 219-6463. Sincerely, Bob Whitmore Chief Division of Recordkeeping Requirements

Reproduced verbatim from osha.gov. US Government work, public domain (17 U.S.C. § 105).

Other letters on the same sections

Deciding a case of your own?

The free recordability check works through Part 1904 in the order the regulation sets out and quotes the provision behind every step.

Check a case — free

Not legal advice. This page republishes 29 CFR Part 1904 as published by the eCFR and explains it. The recordkeeping duty is the employer’s. Where the rule requires judgement, Job13 says so rather than guessing — run your own case through the free check.