OSHA’s standing caveat
Interpretation letters explain existing requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. Enforcement guidance may be affected by later changes to OSHA rules, and a letter addresses the facts it was given — not necessarily yours.
September 20, 1985
The Honorable Rudy Boschwitz
United States Senator
210 Bremer Bldg.
419 N. Robert Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Re: Donald Kottschade
File #5238170021
Dear Senator Boschwitz:
Thank you for your letter of August 27 which contained a letter from Mr. Donald Kottschade. Mr. Kottschade expressed concern that the injury suffered by a friend had not been reported to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) by Champion International Mills, Bonner, Montana.
The requirement for reporting fatalities and/or injuries to OSHA (29 CFR 1904.8) states that fatalities involving one or more employees and/or catastrophes involving injuries to five or more employees must be reported. In the matter described by Mr. Kottschade only one employee was injured. There was, therefore, no requirement to report it.
The company would have been required to record the accident on the OSHA 200 Form, the log of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses; however, such entries do not have to be reported to OSHA. If the company is inspected, the compliance officer will examine the log. It is not customary, however, to go back more than two or three years. Thus the particular accident reported by Mr. Kottschade would probably not have been noticed in any recent inspection of the employer.
If we can be of further service, we shall be glad to do so.
Sincerely,
John B. Miles, Jr., Director
Directorate of Field OperationsReproduced verbatim from osha.gov. US Government work, public domain (17 U.S.C. § 105).
Other letters on the same sections
Deciding a case of your own?
The free recordability check works through Part 1904 in the order the regulation sets out and quotes the provision behind every step.
Check a case — freeNot legal advice. This page republishes 29 CFR Part 1904 as published by the eCFR and explains it. The recordkeeping duty is the employer’s. Where the rule requires judgement, Job13 says so rather than guessing — run your own case through the free check.