§ 1904.8 Recording criteria for needlestick and sharps injuries.
Basic requirement. You must record all work-related needlestick injuries and cuts from sharp objects that are contaminated with another person's blood or other potentially infectious material (as defined by 29 CFR 1910.1030). You must enter the case on the OSHA 300 Log as an injury. To protect the employee's privacy, you may not enter the employee's name on the OSHA 300 Log (see the requirements for privacy cases in paragraphs 1904.29(b)(6) through 1904.29(b)(9)).
Implementation —(1) What does “other potentially infectious material” mean? The term “other potentially infectious materials” is defined in the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens standard at § 1910.1030(b). These materials include:
Human bodily fluids, tissues and organs, and
Other materials infected with the HIV or hepatitis B (HBV) virus such as laboratory cultures or tissues from experimental animals.
Does this mean that I must record all cuts, lacerations, punctures, and scratches? No, you need to record cuts, lacerations, punctures, and scratches only if they are work-related and involve contamination with another person's blood or other potentially infectious material. If the cut, laceration, or scratch involves a clean object, or a contaminant other than blood or other potentially infectious material, you need to record the case only if it meets one or more of the recording criteria in § 1904.7.
If I record an injury and the employee is later diagnosed with an infectious bloodborne disease, do I need to update the OSHA 300 Log? Yes, you must update the classification of the case on the OSHA 300 Log if the case results in death, days away from work, restricted work, or job transfer. You must also update the description to identify the infectious disease and change the classification of the case from an injury to an illness.
What if one of my employees is splashed or exposed to blood or other potentially infectious material without being cut or scratched? Do I need to record this incident? You need to record such an incident on the OSHA 300 Log as an illness if:
It results in the diagnosis of a bloodborne illness, such as HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C; or
It meets one or more of the recording criteria in § 1904.7.
Text reproduced verbatim from the eCFR, edition 2026-01-01, retrieved 2026-07-19. A US Government work in the public domain under 17 U.S.C. 105.
5 OSHA interpretations of § 1904.8
How OSHA has applied this section
Letters of Interpretation are OSHA answering specific questions on specific facts. They explain the requirement above but cannot create additional obligations, and a later letter can supersede an earlier one. Newest first.
- 1999-11-10
Disclosure of OSHA 200 log; SIC 87 exempt from 200 log maintenance.
- 1994-05-26
The Reporting of Fatality of Multiple Hospitalization Incidence.
- 1994-02-22
Incidents involving hospitalization of multiple employees.
- 1985-09-20
Requirements for reporting fatalities and/or injuries to OSHA
- 1981-05-29
Reporting of fatality or multiple hospitalization accidents.
Part-level source: eCFR API, Title 29 Part 1904.
Not legal advice. This page republishes 29 CFR Part 1904 as published by the eCFR and explains it. The recordkeeping duty is the employer’s. Where the rule requires judgement, Job13 says so rather than guessing — run your own case through the free check.